Skip to main content
· 9/11/1998

Schmidt v. Runyon

Citations

  • 20 F. Supp. 2d 1246
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14871
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,643
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 410
  • 1998 WL 646834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the fact that plaintiff “was unaware or was never informed that it was more serious for him to miss” particularly workdays to be “irrelevant,” because, in part, plaintiff did not expect a warning prior to termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.