Skip to main content
· 4/2/1889

Schmidt v. Rowse

Citations

  • 35 Mo. App. 288
  • 1889 Mo. App. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding extrinsic evidence of testator’s intent insufficient because section 62-6-104(e) requires the evidence of intent to be found in the will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.