Schmidt v. Omaha Public Power District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant underground utility clearinghouse had duty to warn callers that only equipment owned by member utilities would be located and to specifically warn that secondary electric lines in a commercial setting would not be located by the member electric company
• holding that defendant underground utility clearinghouse had duty to warn callers that only equipment owned by member utilities would be located and to specifically warn that secondary electric lines in a commercial setting would not be located by the member electric company
• applying a four-factor test, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that a “one-call” clearing house had a duty to warn callers that not all electrical lines were marked by the power companies
• duty to warn of electrical lines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).