Skip to main content
· 6/30/1891

Schmidt v. Market Street & Willow Glen Railroad

Citations

  • 90 Cal. 37
  • 27 P. 61
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the continuing witness rule was unaffected by the enactment of the current Evidence Code
  • noting that the continuing witness rule was unaffected by the enactment of the current Evidence Code
  • explaining that, under the new evidence code, we review unobjected to evidentiary rulings for plain error
  • explaining that, under the new evidence code, we review unobjected to evidentiary rulings for plain error
  • explaining that appellate courts review unobjected-to evidentiary rulings for plain error
  • “[T]he continuing witness rule itself was unaffected by the enactment of the new Evidence Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.