Skip to main content
· 6/24/2005

Schmidt v. Koivisto

Citations

  • 114 P.3d 816
  • 2005 Alas. LEXIS 89
  • 2005 WL 1491738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that penalties provided in Rule 95 for violations of \these rules\ apply to violations of the Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure
  • holding that penalties provided in Rule 95 for violations of \these rules\ apply to violations of the Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure
  • holding that factual findings in support of attorney’s fees awards “are reviewed for clear error”
  • \[When assessing attorney's fees under Rule 95(a) ... the preferred practice is to cite a specific rule that has been violated.\
  • in Rule 95 attorney's fees award, trial court's failure to explain its reasons for assessing attorney's fees \cause[d] us to speculate about the superior court's reasoning and the basis for the sanction\
  • \We have expressed a preference for monetary sanctions over litigation-ending sanctions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.