Schmidt v. Goscicki (In Re Goscicki)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an adversary proceeding cover sheet where the appropriate relief was not checked and no other documents were filed or served on the defendant were not sufficient to comprise a dischargeability complaint
• “the adversary proceeding cover sheet was insufficient to operate as a complaint to determine dis-chargeability”
• “The adversary proceeding cover sheet was insufficient to operate as a complaint to determine dischargeability.”
• civil cover sheet is not a substitute for complaint. Notice to court of intent to file is not a substitute for the filing of an adversary proceeding objecting to discharge
• adversary cover sheet insufficient to operate as complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carole M. Rein Paul M. Driscoll William F. Croce Tina W. Croce and Paul Frenette v. Providian Financial Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-11-05· cited 95×
• In Re Little
  D. New Jersey· 1998-04-09· cited 9×
• Carole M. Rein Paul M. Driscoll William F. Croce Tina W. Croce and Paul Frenette v. Providian Financial Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-06-11· cited 8×
• Mittman v. Casey (In Re Casey)
  S.D. Ohio· 2005-03-22· cited 3×
• Sfakios v. Calafiore (In Re Calafiore)
  D. Connecticut· 1999-08-02· cited 2×
• Calendario v. Pagan (In Re Pagan)
  D. Massachusetts· 2002-09-10· cited 2×
• Leibowitz v. County of Orange (In Re Leibowitz)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-02-22· cited 1×
• Kansas Department of Labor v. Hunter (In re Hunter)
  D. Kansas· 2016-06-09· cited 1×