Schmidt v. Beninga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the evidence showed that the defendant failed to follow a customary procedure, which, if followed, would have prevented the accident at issue
• \ '[N]egligence is tested by foresight but proximate cause is determined by hindsight.' \
• “‘[N]egligence is tested by foresight but proximate cause is determined by hindsight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).