Schmidt v. Beeson Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an administrative officer’s attendance at evidentiary hearings is “not necessary” so long as the officer reviews the transcript and documentary evidence prior to rendering a decision
• holding that an administrative officer's attendance at evidentiary hearings is \not necessary\ so long as the officer reviews the transcript and documentary evidence prior to rendering a decision
• noting that the Alaska court “will uphold a Board decision as to whether to apply equitable principles if it is supported by substantial evidence”
• waiver implied only when party's conduct shows intent to waive and is inconsistent with any intention but waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).