Schmid v. Lencke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although a description contained in a complaint report was consistent with a witness’s testimony, “it lacked essential details to which she later testified at trial, omissions which might have constituted important material for cross-examination”
• “[0]nce it is determined that the statements sought by a defendant come within the Rosario rule, the better practice is to turn over the statements immediately without further analysis as to whether the defendant is technically entitled to disclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).