Skip to main content
· 6/20/1979

Schmid Laboratories v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.

Citations

  • 482 F. Supp. 14
  • 206 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 468
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prospective purchasers will focus on brand name of condoms, not tradenames “ribbed” or “sensi-ribbed”
  • trial court found that the marks “ribbed” and “sensi-ribbed” were prominently displayed with their respective brand names and that the average consumer was not likely to be confused as to the origin of the products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarkson S. Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.