Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the monitoring and recording devices did not qualify as “telephone equipment” because defendant’s communication system was not improved, enhanced, or furthered by the addition of the monitoring and recording devices
• defining a statutory term by considering, among other things, “the express and implied purpose of the statute”
• defining a statutory term by considering, among other things, “the express and implied purpose of the statute”
• relying on the “natural and ordinary meaning of the term ‘direct result’”
• ECPA conforming period indicated Congressional intent to pre-empt contrary state laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).