Skip to main content
· 11/19/1998

Schmalle v. Schmalle

Citations

  • 1998 ND 201
  • 586 N.W.2d 677
  • 1998 N.D. LEXIS 212
  • 1998 WL 800094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when one issue is dispositive, an appellate court may consider additional issues that have been briefed by the parties and are likely to recur, to conserve judicial resources and clarify important points of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Maring, Kaps-Ner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.