· 6/20/1988
Schmall v. Village of Addison
Citations
- 525 N.E.2d 258
- 171 Ill. App. 3d 344
- 121 Ill. Dec. 452
- 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “next of kin” is interpreted in its technical sense under our system of intestate distribution
- finding that next of kin is interpreted in its technical sense under our system of intestate distribution
- expert’s deposition testimony did not so unequivocally establish defendant’s freedom from negligence as to preclude explanation by affidavit
- proof of compliance with codes and regulations is only considered evidence tending to show due care and is not conclusive of the question of negligence
- proof of compliance with codes and regulations is only considered evidence tending to show due care and is not conclusive of the question of negligence
- expert's deposition testimony did not so unequivocally establish defendant's freedom from negligence as to preclude explanation by affidavit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.