Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the government’s proposed expansion-protection test under Corn Products as “dysfunctional” because an acquisition made to “expand” or advance a business into a new area can concomitantly serve to “protect” the existing business
• purchase of stock and loans to new company to obtain services of certain individuals
• purchase of stock and loans to new company to obtain services of certain individuals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).