Schlueter v. Carey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence legally sufficient to support trial court’s finding that Schlueter was Entertainment Properties’s [EP’s] alter ego because evidence showed that Schlueter owned all of the stock of EP, was one of its two officers, and referred to himself and EP interchangeably during testimony
• holding evidence legally sufficient to support trial court’s finding that Schlueter was Entertainment Properties’s [EP’s] alter ego because evidence showed that Schlueter owned all of the stock of EP, was one of its two officers, and referred to himself and EP interchangeably during testimony
• “A complete failure of service deprives a litigant of due process and a trial court of personal jurisdiction; the resulting judgment is void and may be challenged at any time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).