Schloss v. Tears Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s statement, “maybe [I] should contact an attorney,” was equivocal
• holding that suspect’s statement “ ‘[M]aybe [I] should contact an attorney’ ” was an equivocal request for an attorney and, thus, police were not required to cease the interrogation (alterations in original)
• holding a defendant must explicitly invoke the right to counsel after previously waiving the right
• defendant’s statement that “ ‘[mjaybe [I] should contact an attorney’ ” was equivocal (alterations in original)
• ‘When the United States Supreme Court decides an issue under the United States Constitution, all other courts must follow that Court’s rulings.”
• “I didn’t know how much trouble I’m in, and I don’t know if I need a lawyer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).