Schlesselman v. Gouge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider contentions of error related to damages where the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant on \the basic issue of liability\
• \[ Wle have repeatedly held that ... 'the fact that there was a lamentable result is not of itself evidence of negligence on the part of the defendants'\ (quoting Brown, 94 Colo. at 306, 30 P.2d at 263)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).