Schleppy v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court abused its discretion by preventing defense counsel from questioning jurors about an allegation of extrinsic influence and thereby denied defendants the opportunity to prove their claim
• sentencing under § 848 and for a predicate offense not a double jeopardy violation
• suppliers of drug properly convicted of possession due to aiding and abetting the actual possession of their buyers
• suppliers of drug properly convicted of possession due to aiding and abetting the actual possession of their buyers
• “ ‘A party claiming that an improperly influenced jury returned a verdict against him must be given an opportunity to prove that claim.’” (quoting United States v. Forrest, 620 F.2d 446, 457 (5th Cir.1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).