Skip to main content
· 12/2/1907

Schlemmer v. Howard

Citations

  • 120 La. 321
  • 45 So. 263
  • 1907 La. LEXIS 648

Syllabus

<p>1. Appeal — Juetsdiction—Amount in Con-teoveesy — -Fictitious Demand.</p> <p>The resulting damages, if the right claimed by plaintiff is lost, cannot possibly amount to $2,000.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 2, Appeal and Error, §§ 207, 258, 259.]</p> <p>2. Same — Plea Sustained.</p> <p>The allegation of damages is not sufficiently real to defeat the plea of want of jurisdiction.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 2, Appeal and Error, §§ 207, 258, 259.]</p> <p>fSyllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to seal case and docket as stipulation of dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.