Skip to main content

Schlemm v. Cowen

Citations

  • 752 N.E.2d 647
  • 323 Ill. App. 3d 318
  • 256 Ill. Dec. 767
  • 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a petitioner’s claim regarding whether the sentence was “unconstitutional or [was] otherwise imposed in error” is not a cognizable habeas claim
  • \Petitioner's claims that his consecutive sentences were unconstitutional [under new federal case law] * * * are simply not cognizable under section 10-124.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Schlemm v. Cowen

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.