Schleisner Co. v. Birchett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where employee was required as a condition of employment to keep her coat in an “executive closet” and “denied use of a locker,” the relationship between the employer and employee, as to the coat, was one of “ ‘bailment for profit, for the mutual benefit of the parties’ ”
• noting that, in a bailment for profit, which exists “‘for the mutual benefit of the parties,’ ” the bailee is “ ‘under a duty to use ordinary care and diligence in safeguarding the bailor’s property, and subject to liability for any failure to perform that duty.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).