Skip to main content
· 5/16/1991

Schlaifer Nance & Co., Inc. v. Estate of Warhol

Citations

  • 764 F. Supp. 43
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6495
  • 1991 WL 81120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that parties could split their claims arising out of a single transaction between litigation and an ongoing arbitration only because the parties had consented to claim splitting
  • “It generally has been held that state law controls the application of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel in a diversity action in federal court where the issues involved in the prior judgment required the application of State law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.