Skip to main content
· 3/10/2009

Schisel v. Schisel

Citations

  • 762 N.W.2d 265
  • 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 37
  • 2009 WL 605466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that determinations regarding parents’ net incomes for child-support purposes are reviewed for clear error
  • granting district courts the authority to impose in- state locale restrictions after analyzing section 518.17, subdivision 3, which governs custody orders
  • “The bedrock principle underlying any decision affecting the custody of minor children is that their best interests must be protected and fostered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stauber, Kalitowski, Shumaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.