Schiraldi v. Chu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an unjust enrichment claim because “there was no showing that [defendant] obtained any benefit that in equity and good conscience he should not have obtained or possessed because it rightfully belonged to another”
• appellant was entitled to dismissal of unjust enrichment claim “as there was no showing that he obtained any benefit that in equity and good conscience he should not have obtained or possessed because it rightfully belonged to another”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).