Skip to main content
· 4/24/1998

Schimpf v. Gerald, Inc.

Citations

  • 2 F. Supp. 2d 1150
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5830
  • 1998 WL 199013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that \[a] multiple-damages provision's dual nature can result in it being considered more like a compensatory remedy\ for some purposes, \while being considered more like a penalty\ for others
  • “[P]ersonal jurisdiction exists based upon [the defendant’s] own solicitation and the doctrine of apparent agency[.] ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.