Skip to main content
· 4/16/1975

Schiltz v. Cullen-Schiltz & Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 228 N.W.2d 10
  • 1975 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff who established tangible harm may also recover cleanup costs because they are an integral part of direct property damage
  • holding plaintiff who established tangible harm may also recover cleanup costs because they are an integral part of direct property damage
  • recognizing professional negligence against engineers
  • “The plaintiffs were entitled to recover this clean up cost as an element of damages separate from the replacement cost of rebuilding their home.”
  • “The plaintiffs were entitled to recover this clean up cost as an element of damages separate from the replacement cost of rebuilding their home.”
  • expenses incurred as part of clean up operation are recoverable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Mason, Legrand, Rees, Reynold-Son

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.