Schilling v. Bedford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 55-37 “did not affect the common law necessaries doctrine”
• necessaries doctrine violated E.R.A. because it obligates a husband to pay for his wife’s necessaries, but does not similarly obligate the wife
• necessaries doctrine violated E.R.A. because it obligates a husband to pay for his wife's necessaries, but does not similarly obligate the wife
• leaving to legislature decision whether to modify necessaries doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).