Schilling v. Andrew Steel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding fees based on false declarations before the PTO, without which, the court concluded, the plaintiff would not have obtained the patents at issue
• finding exceptionality based on plaintiff's conduct of falsifying declarations before the USPTO to obtain the patents at issue
• awarding fees based on false 24 declarations before the PTO, without which, the court concluded, the plaintiff would not have 25 obtained the patents at issue
• exceptional case when inventor made affirmative, false representations to the PTO about having reduced the patented invitation to practice in order to “swear behind” prior art.
• awarding fees because of false declarations before the PTO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).