Schill v. Choate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since estoppel is an affirmative defense, [the defendants] had the burden to suggest facts which would invoke that doctrine before the trial court.”
• “[E]stoppel ... must be pleaded with particularity and precision, with every essential fact being set forth, for nothing can be supplied by inference or intendment and, indeed, if there is any ground for inference or intendment, it will be against and not in favor of estoppel.”
• ''[Ejstoppel ... must be pleaded with particularity and precision, with every essential fact being set forth, for nothing can be supplied by inference or intendment and, indeed, if there is any ground for inference or intendment, it will be against and not in favor of estoppel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).