Skip to main content
· 4/7/1978

Schiess-Froriep Corp. v. S. S. Finnsailor

Citations

  • 574 F.2d 123
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary judgment for stevedore, holding that a \Himalaya Clause\ that does not specify whose agents and independent contractors are covered does not extend protection to a stevedore who was acting on behalf of the consignee, not the carrier
  • reversing summary judgment for stevedore, holding that a “Himalaya Clause” that does not specify whose agents and independent contractors are covered does not extend protection to a stevedore who was acting on behalf of the consignee, not the carrier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.