Schierstein v. Schierstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding included within the legislative power is the sole prerogative to make policy decisions
• noting an injunction was unnecessary because the declaratory judgment entered in the case provided an adequate remedy at law
• explaining the legislature may enact any law it desires unless expressly prohibited by the state constitution
• allowing executive agency to decline to spend legislatively appropriated funds based on its own policy choices would violate the doctrine
• stating an injunction is a drastic and extraordinary equitable remedy courts may use in their discretion in order to prevent irreparable harm to a party where no adequate remedy exists at law
• stating the General Assembly has \the sole prerogative to make policy decisions\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).