Skip to main content
· 12/18/1961

Schierenbeck v. Minor

Citations

  • 367 P.2d 333
  • 148 Colo. 582
  • 1961 Colo. LEXIS 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • that intercourse between twenty-year old woman and sixteen-year old boy was criminal act on her part irrelevant to boy's duty to support their child
  • that a 21-year-old woman committed a criminal act by having sexual intercourse with a 16-year-old male was irrelevant to his duty to support their child
  • that intercourse between twenty-year old woman and sixteen-year old boy was criminal act on her part irrelevant to boy’s duty to support their child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frantz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.