Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that extension of exclusive liability to project owners did not violate due process or equal protection rights of injured workers
• holding that claimant “still has a substantial and efficient remedy available”
• holding 2004 amendments did not violate equal protection and thus did not violate substantive due process
• noting employer’s agreement to question whether inadequate benefits might violate due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).