Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 1% unaided recognition rate and a 72% aided recognition rate were sufficient to support a finding that the plaintiff's mark was commercially famous
• “This case is not one where unsophisticated customers may fall prey to similar marks of inexpensive products that are in competitive proximity with each other.”
• \[W]hether [a] parody would be sufficiently strong to overcome the potential for consumer confusion was an issue of fact to be decided at trial.\
• survey of 176 subjects admitted “in view of the large percentage of people indicating confusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).