Schiavone v. Fortune

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rule 15(c) requires that defendant receive notice within the statutory period; court cannot amend the unequivocal language of the rule in accordance with its own policy preferences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bechtel v. Robinson
  Third Circuit· 1989-10-03· cited 207×
• GLEASON v. McBRIDE
  Second Circuit· 1989-03-13· cited 32×
• Samuel Joseph Weisgal v. William French Smith, Atty. Gen. Norman A. Carlson William Garrison Fred Walker Donnie Ray Smith United States of America
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-10-16· cited 27×
• Eliasen v. Hamilton
  N.D. Illinois· 1986-07-16· cited 24×
• Landano v. Rafferty
  D. New Jersey· 1989-07-27· cited 12×
• In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation
  D. Delaware· 1993-03-18· cited 8×
• Colonial Mortgage Service Co. v. Aerenson
  D. Delaware· 1985-02-21· cited 6×
• Pessotti v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 1990-11-08· cited 5×
• Mathis v. Bess
  S.D. New York· 1988-08-10· cited 5×
• Esnouf v. Matty
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-05-08· cited 3×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1984-12-10· cited 2×
• Bechtel v. Robinson
  D. Delaware· 1988-12-15· cited 2×
• Kuehl v. Gasway Corp.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1986-03-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
• Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 848×
• Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-18· cited 390×
• Harold B. Hughes and Nancy J. Hughes v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-11-26· cited 108×
• Ingram v. Kumar
  Second Circuit· 1978-10-19· cited 76×