Schexnayder v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, even though the problem may be an ongoing one, the court is bound to act on the record as presented at the time of involuntary placement
• reversing involuntary hospitalization when 3 doctor testified there was “no evidence of dehydration or gross malnutrition”
• even though a problem may be ongoing, the court is bound to act on the record as presented at the time of the involuntary placement
• evidence insufficient to support involuntary placement where there was no evidence of dehydration or gross malnutrition and evidence showed patient had place to live, financial resources (income of $900 per month
• criterion not proven where appellant admitted herself to hospital

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).