Scherr v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly denied the employer's motion for judgment because it was \possible for a jury to draw either of two incompatible inferences from the conflicting evidence\ with respect to the issue of causation
• holding that the trial court properly denied the employer’s motion for judgment because it was “possible for a jury to draw either of two incompatible inferences from the conflicting evidence” with respect to the issue of causation
• If “the claimant had stepped aside from his employment to initiate ... the alleged assault, then the ... claimant is not entitled to recover” workers’ compensation benefits
• “And if the causal connection between the injury and the employment is not apparent, ‘then unusual ... conditions of the employment, constituting risk peculiar to the work, may establish the causal connection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).