Scherr v. Marriott International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff must show a specific intent to return to the premises where the ADA violations occurred based on concrete facts, such as a familial connection or upcoming events
• holding that prospective injunctive relief requires “real and immediate threat of future violations.”
• stating “to establish injury in fact when seeking prospective injunctive relief, a plaintiff must allege a ‘real and immediate’ threat of future violations of their rights” (citing Lyons, 461 U.S. at 102)
• “When the language of a statute is plain, we enforce it according to its terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).