Scherling v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a similar tolling provision passed constitutional muster because \detection of a crime and identification of the criminal are more likely if the criminal remains in the state than if he departs\
• defendant not subjected to greater penalty because he left state; rather, he is faced with tolled statutory period of limitations
• equal protection claim regarding tolling of criminal statute of limitations is measured by less rigorous rational relationship standard
• 22 Cal.3d at pp. 504-505, including fn. 8.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).