Scherillo v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the relative means of the parties was an insignificant factor where plaintiff merely produced conclusory allegations that litigating the case in New Jersey, rather than New York, would be burdensomely expensive
• holding the relative means of the parties was an insignificant factor where plaintiff merely produced conclusory allegations that litigating the case in New Jersey, rather than New York, would be burdensomely expensive
• finding that, though entitled to some consideration, plaintiff’s choice of forum was a secondary consideration in comparison to the locus of operative facts, where the relevant documents are, and the presence of a valid and enforceable forum selection clause
• finding that, though entitled to some consideration, plaintiff’s choice of forum was a secondary consideration in comparison to the locus of operative facts, where the relevant documents are, and the presence of a valid and enforceable forum selection clause
• granting motion to transfer, noting that plaintiff failed to produce documentation showing that litigating in transferee district “would be prohibitively expensive”
• granting motion to transfer, noting that plaintiff failed to produce documentation showing that litigating in transferee district “would be prohibitively expensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).