Skip to main content
· 8/9/2011

Scherer v. United States Forest Service

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 1241
  • 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20259
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16362
  • 2011 WL 3455821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, in the course of rejecting a facial challenge to a HIRA’s implementation plan, that an as-applied challenge might not suffer the same fate
  • “The nature of a challenge depends on how the plaintiffs elect to proceed—whether they seek to vindicate their own rights based on their own circumstances (as-applied
  • “To prevail in [a] facial challenge to an agency’s regulation, the plaintiff[] must show that there is ‘no set of circumstances’ in which the challenged regulation might be applied consistent with the agency’s statutory authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, McKay, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.