· 1/2/1946
Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United States
Citations
- 326 U.S. 432
- 66 S. Ct. 247
- 90 L. Ed. 181
- 1946 U.S. LEXIS 3043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “corporate entities may be disregarded where they are made the implement for avoiding a clear legislative purpose”
- “... corporate entities may be disregarded where they are made the implement for avoiding a clear legislative purpose ... ”
- one who has created a corporate arrangement to carry out his business purposes does not have the choice of disregarding the corporate entity
- farm cooperatives may not disavow corporate form to circumvent migrant labor regulations
- parent corporation could not challenge N.L.R.B. ruling on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiary
- “One who has created a corporate arrangement, chosen as a means of carrying out his business purposes, does not have the choice of disregarding the corporate entity in order to avoid [its] obligations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.