Skip to main content
· 1/2/1946

Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United States

Citations

  • 326 U.S. 432
  • 66 S. Ct. 247
  • 90 L. Ed. 181
  • 1946 U.S. LEXIS 3043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “corporate entities may be disregarded where they are made the implement for avoiding a clear legislative purpose”
  • “... corporate entities may be disregarded where they are made the implement for avoiding a clear legislative purpose ... ”
  • one who has created a corporate arrangement to carry out his business purposes does not have the choice of disregarding the corporate entity
  • farm cooperatives may not disavow corporate form to circumvent migrant labor regulations
  • parent corporation could not challenge N.L.R.B. ruling on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiary
  • “One who has created a corporate arrangement, chosen as a means of carrying out his business purposes, does not have the choice of disregarding the corporate entity in order to avoid [its] obligations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.