· 9/30/2009
Schengrund v. Pennsylvania State University
Citations
- 705 F. Supp. 2d 425
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90349
- 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 737
- 2009 WL 3182490
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiffs may also recover back pay for up to two years prior to the earliest paycheck received within the statute of limitations under the FPA
- stating that the PHRA is “treated as identical to federal antidiscrimination laws”
- applying Title VII standards for employer liability to PHRA claims asserted after the enactment of the FPA
- “[U]nder the EPA each paycheck issued to the [female] Professors at a lower pay rate than that received by their male colleagues constitutes a new discriminatory action for purposes of EPA accrual.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yvette Kane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.