Skip to main content
· 9/30/2009

Schengrund v. Pennsylvania State University

Citations

  • 705 F. Supp. 2d 425
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90349
  • 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 737
  • 2009 WL 3182490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiffs may also recover back pay for up to two years prior to the earliest paycheck received within the statute of limitations under the FPA
  • stating that the PHRA is “treated as identical to federal antidiscrimination laws”
  • applying Title VII standards for employer liability to PHRA claims asserted after the enactment of the FPA
  • “[U]nder the EPA each paycheck issued to the [female] Professors at a lower pay rate than that received by their male colleagues constitutes a new discriminatory action for purposes of EPA accrual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yvette Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.