Skip to main content
· 11/21/1978

Schenck v. Pelkey

Citations

  • 176 Conn. 245
  • 405 A.2d 665
  • 6 A.L.R. 4th 481
  • 1978 Conn. LEXIS 958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting similarities between strict liability for sale of unreasonably dangerous products and implied warranty of merchantability
  • noting similarities between strict liability for sale of unreasonably dangerous products and implied warranty of merchantability
  • admissibility of safety measure taken by other manufacturers subsequent to manufacture of product in question to demonstrate feasibility within discretion of trial court
  • “[a] dealer who sells articles which ordinarily are used in only one way impliedly warrants fitness for use in that particular way” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • where plaintiffs used swimming pool slide for its “ordinary purpose,” the correct warranty was “one of merchantability,” which was the “broader” of the two implied warranties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bogdanski, Cotter, Loiselle, Longo, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.