Skip to main content
· 3/13/1998

Schenck v. City of Hudson

Citations

  • 997 F. Supp. 902
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3410
  • 1998 WL 125778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a growth ordinance did not violate the Contract Clause because it did not directly affect the parties’ contracts, but incidentally impaired them
  • “Land use is a legitimate matter of concern for [town].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.