· 3/13/1998
Schenck v. City of Hudson
Citations
- 997 F. Supp. 902
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3410
- 1998 WL 125778
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a growth ordinance did not violate the Contract Clause because it did not directly affect the parties’ contracts, but incidentally impaired them
- “Land use is a legitimate matter of concern for [town].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.