Schenck v. Bear, Stearns & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defendant “had neither discretion nor responsibility over supervision of plaintiffs account” for certain matters, the “mat ters were not entrusted to [defendant], [and] there was no fiduciary obligation between [defendant] and plaintiff with respect to” those matters
• “The scope of affairs entrusted to a broker is generally limited to the completion of a USCA11 Case: 23-10436 Document: 56-1 Date Filed: 10/08/2024 Page: 23 of 31 23-10436 Opinion of the Court 23 transaction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).