Skip to main content
· 7/17/1990

Schenck Ex Rel. Estate of Schenck v. Walt Disney Co.

Citations

  • 742 F. Supp. 838
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8780
  • 1990 WL 117987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Disney World Co. [does not] engage[] in activities in New York beyond the ‘mere solicitation’ of business”
  • “This so called ‘solicitation plus’ rule is satisfied when, in addition to solicitation, the foreign corporation is involved in some financial or commercial dealings in New York or holds itself out as operating in New York.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cannella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.