· 6/14/2005
Schenberg v. Bitzmart, Inc.
Citations
- 178 S.W.3d 543
- 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 881
- 2005 WL 1395062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that motion for new trial in judge-tried case is “perfunctory” and corporation not required to have attorney file motion on its behalf
- “normal effect of a representative’s unauthorized practice of law is to dismiss the cause or treat the particular actions taken by the representative as a nullity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sherri B. Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.