Skip to main content
· 6/14/2005

Schenberg v. Bitzmart, Inc.

Citations

  • 178 S.W.3d 543
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 881
  • 2005 WL 1395062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that motion for new trial in judge-tried case is “perfunctory” and corporation not required to have attorney file motion on its behalf
  • “normal effect of a representative’s unauthorized practice of law is to dismiss the cause or treat the particular actions taken by the representative as a nullity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherri B. Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.