Schellenberg v. Winnetka Park District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying in part on expert opinion and holding that obvious risk doctrine did not bar minor plaintiff's suit in case involving \run-and-plunge\ dive into shallow water
• “a duty to warn arises where the existence of a dangerous condition is known *** and it is not apparent to the other party”
• “Even if a risk is considered open and obvious, a duty to warn may still be imposed”
• “a duty to warn arises where the existence of a dangerous condition is known *** and it is not apparent to the other party”
• “Even if a risk is considered open and obvious, a duty to warn may still be imposed”
• “a duty to warn arises where the existence of a dangerous condition is known *** and it is not apparent 14 No. 1-06-1447 to the other party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).