Scheinkman v. Scheinkman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the party claiming usury has the burden to show the lender’s “intention, at the time of the transaction, to charge more interest for the use of money than the law allows, which is an essential ingredient of usury”
• the party claiming usury has the burden to show the lender’s “intention at the time of the transaction to charge more interest for the use of money than the law allows, which is an essential ingredient of usury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).